Well that was fast. The DNC sure pulled that one off the air with lightning speed. It only went up today.
I guess they realized their "non-resonating" problem was resonating.
(The DNC's ad said voters in this year's election have the choice of "moving forward" or going back to Bush's policies. The forward movement it conjured was like what you'd feel on a roller-coaster ride. You, umm, don't want to feel it.)
The ad's back up. It's all about "moving FORWARD" when the rest of us have vertigo. He's not running against Bush, and 18 months in office won't change that fact.
Check out "Does Obama want to get re-elected in 2012?" by the UK Telegraph.
3 comments:
Well that was fast. The DNC sure pulled that one off the air with lightning speed. It only went up today.
I guess they realized their "non-resonating" problem was resonating.
(The DNC's ad said voters in this year's election have the choice of "moving forward" or going back to Bush's policies. The forward movement it conjured was like what you'd feel on a roller-coaster ride. You, umm, don't want to feel it.)
I'm supposed to believe that Geithner is going to paint anything other than rainbows and unicorns?
F-ing-a NYT - nice bait-n-switch. I understand it's an opinion page, but it reads like propaganda. Not cool. Not cool at all.
The ad's back up. It's all about "moving FORWARD" when the rest of us have vertigo. He's not running against Bush, and 18 months in office won't change that fact.
Check out "Does Obama want to get re-elected in 2012?" by the UK Telegraph.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/7958031/Does-Barack-Obama-want-to-be-re-elected-in-2012.html
Post a Comment